IN process: New Materials will be posted as they are finalized
|
|||
Dale Collins NB: "±" indicates that the hyperlink will take you to another site. |
|||
|
I | ||
|
|||
This page contains the memorandum introducing the course, class schedule, reading materials, and class notes for the Merger Antitrust Law course taught during the 2023 fall semester at Georgetown. It also contains links to related supplemental materials on the Applied Antitrust web site. There is no textbook for this course. Everything you need will be linked to this page. Introduction and "Rules of the Road" Memorandum (revised Aug. 8, 2024) DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines (rev. Dec. 18, 2023)
|
|||
Required Reading |
Comments and Optional Reading |
||
Unit 1 |
Merger Antitrust Law: TransDigm/Takata |
||
Class 1 |
Tuesday, August 27 Introduction to course |
Introduction and "Rules of the Road" Memorandum (revised Aug. 8, 2024) Merger Antitrust Law: Introduction to Substance and Process (class notes) Class 1 homework assignment (optional in the first week)
|
TransDigm/Takata case study (complete) Note on Antitrust Hornbooks and Other Study Aids Demand curves and consumer surplus (YouTube videos): Marginal Revolution University, The Demand Curve Marginal Revolution University, A Deeper Look at the Demand Curve Marginal Revolution University, What Is Consumer Surplus? Marginal Revolution University, What Is Producer Surplus? Marginal Revolution University, What Is Deadweight Loss? Deadweight Loss- Key Graphs of Microeconomics Consumer welfare ± Stigler Center, Defining the Consumer Welfare Standard (Apr. 20, 2023) ± Douglas H. Ginsburg, Wither the Consumer Welfare Standard?, 46 Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y 69 (2023) ± ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Is Consumer Welfare In Hot Water? (Sep't 9, 2022) (YouTube) (transcript) Alternative goals of antitrust law ± Eric A. Posner, Market Power, Not Consumer Welfare: A Return to the Foundations of Merger Law (February 18, 2023). The 2023 Merger Guidelines ± Herbert Hovenkamp, The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Law, Fact, and Method, 65 Rev. Indus. Org. 39 (2024) ± Steven C. Salop, The 2023 Merger Guidelines: A Post-Chicago and Neo-Brandeisian Integration, 65 Rev. Indus. Org. 79 (2024) ± Dennis W. Carlton, The 2023 Merger Guidelines: A Critical Assessment, 65 Rev. Indus. Org. 129 (2024) ± Carl Shapiro, Evolution of the Merger Guidelines: Is This Fox Too Clever by Half?, 65 Rev. Indus. Org. 147 (2024) ± Michael Salinger, The 2023 Merger Guidelines and The Role of Economics, 65 Rev. Indus. Org. 243 (2024) Twombly/Iqbal Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) |
Unit 2 |
Predicting Merger Antitrust Enforcement Challenges |
||
Class 2 |
Thursday, August 29 Predicting merger antitrust enforcement challenges DOJ/FTC 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines
|
Predicting Merger Antitrust Enforcement Challenges (class notes) Class 2 homework assignment (optional in the first week)
|
Changes in antitrust enforcement policy ± Susan Athey & Aviv Nevo, DOJ and FTC Chief Economists Explain the Changes to the 2023 Merger Guidelines, ProMarket.org (Dec. 19, 2023) Lina M. Khan, Chair. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Remarks As Prepared for Delivery Economic Club of New York, New York, NY (July 24, 2023), ± Oversight of Federal Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws, Hearing before the Subcomm. on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights of the S. Comm. on the Judiciary (Sept. 20, 2022) (video) Jonathan Kanter. Ass't Att'y Gen., Antitrust Div., U.S. Dep't of Justice (prepared statement) Lina M. Khan, Chair. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Remarks Prepared for Delivery at the Fordham Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law & Policy, New York, NY (Sept. 16, 2022) Jonathan Kanter, Ass't Att'y Gen. Antitrust Div., U.S. Dep't of Justice, Respecting the Antitrust Laws and Reflecting Market Realities, Prepared Remarks Before the Georgetown Antitrust Law Symposium, Washington, DC (Sept. 13, 2022) Noah Joshua Phillips, Comm'nr, Fed. Trade Comm'n, Disparate Impact: Winners And Losers From The New M&A Policy, Prepared Remarks Before the Eighth Annual Berkeley Spring Forum on M&A and the Boardroom, San Francisco, CA (Apr. 27, 2022) ± Jeffrey T. Macher, John W. Mayo, David Sappington & Mark Whitener, The Evolution of Judicial Standards: Evidence from Litigated Merger Trials (Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper No. 3809174, June 5, 2022). Logan Billman & Steven C. Salop, Merger Enforcement Statistics: 2001-2020 (Nov. 4, 2022) The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines Evolution of the Merger Guidelines (not yet updated to include the 2023 Draft DOJ/FTC Draft Merger Guidelines) ± Carl Shapiro & Howard Shelanski, Judicial Response to the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 58 Rev. Indus. Org. 51 (2021) ± Joseph Farrell & Carl Shapiro, The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines After 10 Years, 58 Rev. Indus. Org. 1 (2021) ± Carl Shapiro, The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years, 77 Antitrust 701 (2010). 2022-23 Merger Guidelines revision project Press Release, U.S. Dept. of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission Seek to Strengthen Enforcement Against Illegal Mergers (Jan. 18, 2022) Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm'n, FTC and DOJ Seek Comment on Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023) Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Justice Department and FTC Seek Comment on Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023) U.S. Dep’t of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023) U.S. Dep’t of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Fact Sheet–2023 Draft Merger Guidelines for Public Comment (July 19, 2023) |
Unit 3 |
First Client Meeting/Some Antitrust History |
Unit 3A class slides (First Client Meeting) |
|
Class 3 |
Tuesday, September 3 First client meeting (first half) Some antitrust history (second half) |
First half of class Review class notes for Class 2 Second half of class A Brief History of Antitrust Law (class notes) There is no homework assignment for this class
|
Commentary ± Herbert Hovenkamp, Will Antitrust Become Progressive? (Apr. 22, 2024) ± Herbert Hovenkamp, The Slogans and Goals of Antitrust Law (June 14, 2022). Dale Collins, Antitrust on the Brink: The Calls for Radical Reform, Presentation to the Antitrust Law Association (Sept. 16, 2021) (slides) Christine S. Wilson, Comm'r, Fed. Trade Comm'n, The Neo-Brandeisian Revolution: Unforced Errors and the Diminution of the FTC, Prepared Remarks for the ABA Antitrust Law Section’s 2021 Fall Forum (Nov. 9, 2021) ± Herbert Hovenkamp & Fiona Scott Morton, Framing the Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis, 168 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1843 (2020) ± Carl Shapiro, Antitrust in a Time of Populism, 61 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 714 (2018).
Withdrawal of FTC 2015 Section 5 Policy Statement Fed. Trade Comm'n, Statement of Enforcement Principles Regarding “Unfair Methods of Competition” Under Section 5 of the FTC Act (2015) FTC video of July 1, 2021, open meeting (excerpts of Section 5 Policy Statement discussion) NB: This is a very large file that needs to be downloaded before it can be played. Alternatively, go to the complete streaming version on the FTC web page, listen to the introduction up to the first issue and then skip to around 43:20 Congressional testimony Oversight of Federal Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Competition Policy, Antitrust & Consumer Rights of the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 117th Cong. (Sept. 20, 2022) (statement of the Federal Trade Commission) Dissenting Statement of Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson, Federal Trade Commission (Sept. 20, 2022)
2022 FTC Section 5 Policy Statement Policy Statement Regarding the Scope of Unfair Methods of Competition Under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (Nov. 10, 2022) (3-1 vote) Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm'n, FTC Restores Rigorous Enforcement of Law Banning Unfair Methods of Competition (Nov. 10, 2022) Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Joined by Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya (Nov. 10, 2022) Statement of Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya, Joined by Chair Lina M. Khan and Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter (Nov. 10, 2022) Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson (Nov. 10, 2022) |
Unit 4 |
The DOJ/FTC Merger Review Process |
||
Class 4 |
Thursday, September 5 Merger review process Kroger/Albertsons |
The DOJ/FTC Merger Review Process (class notes) Class 4 homework assignment #1 Optional: Albertsons/Safeway case study (complete)
|
± Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, Clayton Act § 7A, 18 U.S.C. § 18a (Premerger notification and waiting period) ± HSR Form (ver. 1.0.2) (updated Aug. 4, 2017) ± HSR form instructions (Sept. 25, 2019) Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 89 Fed. Reg. 7708 (Feb. 5, 2024) (effective Mar. 6, 2024) Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022 (contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, Pub. L. No. 117-328, Div. GG, 136 Stat. 4459, ____ (Dec. 29, 2022)). "Clearance" U.S. Gov't Accountability Office, DOJ and FTC Jurisdictions Overlap, but Conflicts Are Infrequent (Jan. 2023) Preliminary investigations ± John W. Mayo, Robert Press & Mark Whitener, Understanding Early-Stage Merger Investigations: What Drives the Antitrust Agencies? (Sept. 2023) Second request investigations DOJ Model Second Request (Apr. 2022) FTC Model Second Request (Oct. 2021) Model timing agreements DOJ Model Timing Agreement (July 2022) FTC Model Timing Agreement (Feb. 2019) Privilege Order re Petition to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Dated April 24, 2009, File No. 091-0064 (F.T.C. July 21, 2009) (in the FTC’s investigation of Thoratec Corp.’s pending acquisition of HeartWare International) Blockbuster "substantial compliance" second request litigation Complaint for Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Section 7A(g)(2) of the Clayton Act and Section 13(b} of the Federal Trade Commission Act, FTC v. Blockbuster. Inc., No. 1:05-cv-00463-ESH (D.D.C. filed Mar. 4, 2005) Docket sheet (downloaded Aug. 5, 2023) Motion for Order Pursuant to Section 7A(g)(2) of the Clayton Act and Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act--Mar. 4, 2005 Supporting memorandum filed under seal FTC's reply filed under seal Notice of Settlement (Mar. 9, 2005) Agreed Order Regarding Extension of Hart-Scott-Rodino Waiting Period (Mar. 9, 2005) Dismissed with prejudice (Mar 9, 2005)
Withdrawal of FTC 1995 Policy Statement on Prior Approvals Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm’n, FTC Acts To Reduce Prior-Approval Burden on Companies in Merger Cases (June 22, 1995) Fed. Trade Comm'n, Notice and Request for Comment Regarding Statement of Policy Concerning Prior Approval and Prior Notice Provisions in Merger Cases, 60 Fed. Reg. 39745 (Aug. 3, 1995). Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm’n, FTC Rescinds 1995 Policy Statement that Limited the Agency’s Ability to Deter Problematic Mergers (July 21, 2021). Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Noah Joshua Phillips (July 21, 2021)
Other supplemental materials ± FTC Competition Enforcement Database: Merger Enforcement Actions (since 1996) ± FTC Enforcement: Cases and Proceedings ± DOJ Merger Enforcement web page ± DOJ and FTC, Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report: Fiscal Year 2021 (Feb. 2023) (latest published report) Makan Delrahim, It Takes Two: Modernizing the Merger Review Process, Prepared Remarks Before the 2018 Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium, Washington, DC (Sept. 25, 2018)
|
Unit 5 |
Merger Antitrust Settlements |
For additional supplemental materials, see 13. DOJ/FTC Merger Review and Settlement Procedures in AppliedAntitrust.com |
|
Class 5 |
Tuesday, September 10 Settlements Kroger/Albertsons
|
Class 5 reading guidance (rev. Aug. 31, 2024) Unit 5 reading materials (rev. Aug. 31, 2024) Press Release, The Kroger Co., Kroger and Albertsons Companies Announce Comprehensive Divestiture Plan with C&S Wholesale Grocers, LLC in Connection with Proposed Merger (September 8, 2023) Unit 5. Merger Antitrust Settlements (class notes) There is no homework assignment for this class |
Case studies Albertsons/Safeway case study (complete) Agency materials: DOJ Makan Delrahim,Ass't Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div., Improving the Antitrust Consensus, Prepared Remarks Before the New York State Bar Association Antitrust Section, New York, NY (Jan. 25, 2018) U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div., Antitrust Division Manual Ch. 4 D: Negotiating and Entering Consent Decrees (5th ed. updated Mar. 2014) U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div., Antitrust Division Policy Guide to Merger Remedies (rev. June 2011) (news release) Agency materials: FTC Fed. Trade Comm’n, Bureau of Competition, Negotiating Merger Remedies (Jan. 2012) Fed. Trade Comm'n, The FTC’s Merger Remedies 2006-2012: A Report of the Bureaus of Competition and Economics (Jan. 2017) (FTC news release) Dan Ducore & Naomi Licker, Bureau of Competition, Fed. Trade Comm'n, Looking Back (Again) at FTC Merger Remedies (Feb. 3, 2017) Fed. Trade Comm'n, Bureau of Competition, Frequently Asked Questions About Merger Consent Order Provisions (downloaded August 8, 2019) Deborah L. Feinstein, Dir., Bureau of Competition, Fed. Trade Comm'n, The Significance of Consent Orders in the Federal Trade Commission’s Competition Enforcement Efforts (Sept. 17, 2013) Other materials Jonathan M. Jacobson, Issues in Antitrust Consent Decrees, Presented to the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (Apr. 26, 2018) William J. Donovan & Breck P. McAllister, Consent Decrees in the Enforcement of Federal Anti-Trust Laws, 46 Harv. L. Rev. 885 (1933) (for some early history of the use of consent decrees in antitrust cases) |
Unit 6 |
Merger Antitrust Litigation |
For additional supplemental materials, see 14. Merger Antitrust Litigation in AppliedAntitrust.com |
|
Class 6 |
Thursday, September 12 Litigating merger antitrust cases ABI/Grupo Modelo
|
Unit 6. Merger Antitrust Litigation (class notes) For some background slides, see Unit 6: Homework—Kroger/Albertsons |
Case study The Course of Litigation: EnergySolutions’ Acquisition of Waste Control Specialists (Nov. 16, 2016) ABI/Grupo Modelo ± Planet Money, Episode 438: Mavericks, Monopolies and Beer (Feb. 23, 2013) (ABI/Grupo Modelo) ± WSJ Explains, The Antitrust Lawsuit That Helped Make Modelo America’s Top Beer, WSJ.coml (Sept. 20, 2023) (video) ± Morning Brew, How Mexican Beer Conquered The American Beer Market (YouTube undated) |
Unit 7 |
Hertz/Avis Budget/Dollar Thrifty |
Unit 7A class slides (Class 7) For additional supplemental materials, see 13. DOJ/FTC Merger Review and Settlement Procedures in AppliedAntitrust.com |
|
Class 7 |
Tuesday, September 17 The 2010 Hertz/Dollar Thrifty deal
|
There are no class notes for this class Class 7 homework assignment Instructor's answer (Part A) (link corrected) |
YouTube videos Present value of a perpetuity (perpetual annuity) |
Class 8 |
Thursday, September 19 Antitrust risk-shifting in the merger agreement The bidding war with Avis |
Allocating Antitrust Risk in Merger Agreements (class notes)
|
Risk-shifting in Hertz/Dollar Thrifty Risk-shifting in Hertz/Dollar Thrifty (optional class notes) Risk-shifting generally For a collection of now somewhat datedd antitrust-related provisions appearing in merger agreements, see Dale Collins, Sample Antitrust-Related Provisions in M&A Agreements, AntitrustUnpacked.com (July 2, 2018) ± Scott Sher, Brendan Coffman & Alexandra Keck, Risk Allocation in Merger Agreements in an Era of Increased Enforcement (Oct. 23, 2020) ± Gail F. Levine, Martha E. McGarry, Andrew J. Noreuil, Camila Panama & William H. Stallings, Mayer Brown, M&A Lawyers Adapt to New Era of Antitrust Enforcement: How Contractual Provisions Are Evolving(Jan. 2023). ± Richard Hall & Maurio A. Fiore, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, U.S. Regulatory Merger Control Regimes Negotiating with Deal Delays in Mind (2023). ± Stephen Fraidin, Joel Mitnick, & Ross Steinberg, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, Hell or High Water Provisions in Merger Agreements: A Practical Approach (May 25, 2022) ± Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, “Hell Or High Water” Clauses in Merger & Acquisition Agreements (Aug. 19, 2022) + Dale Collins, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Antitrust Reverse Termination Fees—2020 Q3 Update (Dec. 28, 2020) (data set). Anthem/Cigna contract litigation In re Anthem-Cigna Merger Litig., No. CV 2017-0114-JTL, 2020 WL 5106556 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020) (unpublished), judgment entered, (Del. Ch. 2020), summarily aff'd sub nom. Cigna Corp. v. Anthem, Inc., 251 A.3d 1015 (Del. 2021) (unpublished) The Hertz/Avis Budget/Dollar Thifty bidding war Hertz/Avis Budget/Dollar Thrifty: The Bidding War for a collection on SEC materials and press releases on the bidding war for Dollar Thrifty between Hertz and Avis Budget. |
Unit 8 |
Competition Economics |
|
|
Class 9 |
Tuesday, September 24
|
Competition Economics Part 1 (class notes) There are no reading materials for this class
|
Studies ± The Merger Working Group, International Competition Network, The Role of Economics and Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis (Apr. 2013). YouTube videos Revenue, Costs and Profit Part 1 Revenue, Costs and Profit Part 2 Revenue, Costs and Profit Part 3 Marginal Revolution University, The Demand Curve Marginal Revolution University, A Deeper Look at the Demand Curve Marginal Revolution University, The Demand Curve Shifts Marginal Revenue for a Monopolist Facing Linear Demand Finding a Revenue Function from a Linear Demand Function Marginal Revolution University, The Supply Curve Marginal Revolution University, A Deeper Look at the Supply Curve Marginal Revolution University, The Supply Curve Shifts Marginal Revolution University, The Equilibrium Price and Quantity Marginal Revolution University, Exploring Equilibrium Marginal Revolution University. Maximizing Profit Under Competition Commentary Dennis W. Carlton & Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization (4th ed. 2005). A Marginal Revenue Problem Step-by-Step (by Step) A Profit-Maximization Problem Step-by-Step (by Step) ± See also Dave Berry, Up in the Air on the Question of Gravity, Baltimore Sun, Mar. 16, 1997, at 3J
Really, really optional: If you want to understand derivatives and would like a quick introduction, see the following YouTube videos: Derivatives... What? (on the theory of derivatives) Derivatives... How? (on calculating the derivative--first 6.5 minutes is sufficient) |
Class 10 |
Thursday, September 26 Part 2. Markets and Market Equilibrium Substitutes, complements, and elasticities Perfectly competitive markets Perfectly monopolized markets Imperfectly competitive markets
|
Basic Competition Economics Part 2 (class notes) There are no reading materials for this class
|
Commentary ± Kenneth G. Elzinga & David E. Mills, The Lerner Index of Monopoly Power: Origins and Uses (working paper Jan. 18, 2011), final version at 101 Am. Econ. Rev. 558 (2011). YouTube videos How Substitutes and Complements Affect Demand Marginal Revolution University, Elasticity of Demand Marginal Revolution University, Calculating Elasticity of Demand Marginal Revolution University, Elasticity and its Applications Marginal Revolution University, Calculating the Elasticity of Demand Intuition for Monopoly and Elasticity Marginal Revolution University, The Equilibrium Price and Quantity Marginal Revolution University, Exploring Equilibrium Marginal Revolution University, Introduction to the Competitive Firm Marginal Revolution University, Maximizing Profit Under Competition How to Solve Cournot Problem: Algebra-Based Solution Liam Malloy, Cournot Asymmetric Costs and n Firms Bertrand Oligopoly (solving a Bertrand oligopoly problem) |
OPTIONAL |
Friday, September 27 3:30 pm - 5:30 pm
|
Optional economics review session |
|
Unit 9 |
H&R Block/TaxACT |
|
|
Class 11 |
Tuesday, October 1 Analysis of the district court opinion Institutional setting Market definition: (Brown Shoe factors) Introduction to the hypothetical monopolist test |
|
Case commentary Marc Remer & Frederick R. Warren-Boulton, United States v. H&R Block: Market Definition in Court since the 2010 Merger Guidelines, 59 Antitrust Bull. 599 (2014). Generally AppliedAntitrust.com, Market Definition 1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments ch. 6 (9th ed. 2022) (market definition). This is the best complication of the current law on market definition. It is the first source to which you should turn if you have questions about how the courts apply the law. ± Herbert Hovenkamp, Antimonopoly Antitrust Metrics (2024) ± Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust Market Definition: The Hypothetical Monopolist and Brown Shoe (June 10, 2024) ± Christine Wilson & Keith Klovers, Same Rule, Different Result: How the Narrowing of Product Markets Has Altered Substantive Antitrust Rules, 84 Antitrust L.J. 55 (2021) ± Serge Moresi, Steven C. Salop & John Woodbury, Market Definition in Merger Analysis (Feb. 9, 2017) ± Malcolm Coate & Jeffrey Fischer, Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis (Jan. 2010) ± Jonathan B. Baker, Market Definition: An Analytical Overview, 74 Antitrust L.J. 129 (2007). ± Jonathan B. Baker & Timothy F. Bresnahan, Economic Evidence in Antitrust: Defining Markets and Measuring Market Power in Handbook of Antitrust Economics 1 (Paolo Buccirossi ed., 2008). ± Gregory J. Werden, The History of Antitrust Market Delineation, 76 Marquette L. Rev. 123 (1992). Criticism Louis Kaplow, The 2023 Merger Guidelines and Market Definition: Doubling Down or Folding?, 65 Rev. Ind. Organ. 7 (2024) ± Louis Kaplow, Why (Ever) Define Markets?, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 437 (2010) ± Louis Kaplow, Market Definition Alchemy May 2013), published at 57 Antitrust Bull. 915 (2012) ± Malcolm B. Coate, Market Definition is Not Alchemy (Jan. 22, 2014). Louis Kaplow, Market Definition: Impossible and Counterproductive, 79 Antitrust L.J. 361 (2013) YouTube The Global Antitrust Institute, Market Definition (general introduction) H&R Block/TaxACT commentary Marc Remer & Frederick R. Warren-Boulton, United States v. H&R Block: Market Definition in Court since the 2010 Merger Guidelines, 59 Antitrust Bull. 599 (2014). ± Malcolm B. Coate, Market Definition in Differentiated Goods When the Final Consumer Buys the Good: Insights from the H&R Block Case (Feb. 12, 2014). ± Joseph J. Simons & Malcolm B. Coate, Should DOJ’s Controversial Approach to Market Definition Control Merger Litigation, the Case of US v. H&R Block (Oct. 24, 2013). ± James A. Keyte, United States v. H&R Block: The DOJ Invokes Brown Shoe to Shed the Oracle Albatross, Antitrust, Spring 2012, at 32. ± Deborah Feinstein, The Significance of H&R Block: Brown Shoe Meets Merger Simulation, Antitrust, Spring 2012, at 5. Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm Matthew T. Panhans, The Rise, Fall, and Legacy of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm (Jan. 2023). William E. Kovacic & Carl Shapiro, Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, 14 J. Econ. Perspectives 43 (2000). |
Class 12 |
Thursday, October 3 Analysis of the district court opinion Market definition (critical loss tests) |
|
See generally AppliedAntitrust.com, Market Definition Critical loss analysis ± Joseph Farrell & Carl Shapiro, Improving Critical Loss Analysis, Antitrust Source, Feb. 2008. ± Michael Katz & Carl Shapiro, Further Thoughts on Critical Loss, Antitrust Source, Mar. 2004 ± Michael Katz & Carl Shapiro, Critical Loss: Let’s Tell the Whole Story, Antitrust, Spring 2003 Daniel P. O’Brien & Abraham L. Wickelgren, A Critical Analysis of Critical Loss Analysis, 71 Antitrust L.J. 161 (2003) ± David T. Scheffman & Joseph J. Simons, The State of Critical Loss Analysis: Let’s Make Sure We Understand the Whole Story, Antitrust Source, Nov. 2003 ± Daniel O’Brien & Abraham Wickelgren, The State of Critical Loss Analysis: Reply to Scheffman and Simons, Antitrust Source, Mar. 2004. ± Carl Shapiro, Mergers with Differentiated Products, Antitrust, Spring 1996, at 23. ± Oxera, "Could: or Would"? The Difference between Two Hypothetical Monopolists (Nov. 2008) ± Serge Moresi & Hans Zenger, Recapture Ratios In Merger Analysis (Oct. 29, 2017). Øystein Daljord & Lars Sørgard, Single-Product Versus Uniform SSNIPs, 31 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 142 (2011) (± working paper version) Expert economic witnesses ± Brian Rafkin & Blair Kuykendall, Antitrust Cancel Culture: Do Economic Experts Really Cancel Each Other Out in Merger Litigation?, Anitrust, Spring 2021, at 55. Office of the Inspector General, Fed. Trade Comm'n, OIG Report No. A-20-03, Audit of Federal Trade Commission Expert Witness Services (Nov. 14, 2019) |
Class 13 |
Tuesday, October 8 Analysis of the district court opinion Market definition (diversion ratio recapture tests) |
|
Commentary ± Serge Moresi & Hans Zenger, Recapture Ratios In Merger Analysis (Oct. 29, 2017). ± Oliver Budzinski & Isabel Ruhmer, Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey (working paper Jan. 2009), final version at 6 J. Competition L. & Econ. 277 (2010). ± Oxera, Diversion Ratios: Why Does It Matter Where Customers Go If a Shop Is Closed? (Feb. 2009) ± Howard Chang, Diversion Ratios (2012) (YouTube) ± Christopher Conlon & Julie Holland Mortimer, The Role of Diversion Ratios and Surveys in Horizontal Mergers (2022). Christopher Conlon & Julie Holland Mortimer, Empirical Properties of Diversion Ratios, 52 RAND J. Econ. 693 (2021). Jeff Qiu, Masayuki Sawada & Gloria Sheu, Win/Loss Data and Consumer Switching Costs: Measuring Diversion Ratios and the Impact of Mergers, 72 J. Indus. Econ. 327 (2024) |
Class 14 |
Thursday, October 10 Analysis of the district court opinion PNB presumption Ease of entry defense Coordinated effects Elimination of a "maverick" |
|
Identifying market participants; determining market share and concentration 1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments 361-71 (9th ed. 2022) Concentration thresholds + Volker Nocke & Michael D. Whinston, Concentration Thresholds for Horizontal Mergers, 112 Am. Econ. Rev. 1915 (2022). Coordinated effects 1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments 375-77 (9th ed. 2022) (coordinated effects). Janusz A. Ordover, Coordinated Effects, in 2 Issues In Competition Law and Policy 1359 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008). Miguel de la Mano, Coordinated Effects (undated) + John Asker & Volker Nocke, Collusion, Mergers, and Related Antitrust Issues (NBER Working Paper 29175, Aug. 2021), final version, 5 Handbook of Industrial Organization 177 (Kate Ho, Ali Hortacsu & Alessandro Lizzeri eds., 2021) + D. Daniel Sokol & Sean Sullivan, The Decline of Coordinated Effects and How to Reverse It (Mar. 35, 2023). ± Simon Loertscher & Leslie M. Marx, Coordinated Effects in Merger Review, 64 J.L. & Econ. 705 (2021) (± Appendix) Robert H. Porter, Mergers and Coordinated Effects, 73 Int'l J. Indus. Org. ___ (2020) (± slide deck) ± Natalia II Fabra & Massimo Motta, Assessing Coordinated Effcts in Merger Cases (Nov. 30, 2016), final version at Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization ch. 5 (Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini eds. 2018) ± Jonathan B. Baker, Mavericks, Mergers and Exclusion: Proving Coordinated Competitive Effects Under the Antitrust Laws, 77 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 135 (2002). ± William E. Kovacic Robert C. Marshall, Leslie M. Marx & Steven P. Schulenberg, Quantitative Analysis of Coordinated Effects, 76 Antitrust L.J. 397 (2009). ± Oxera, The Ties that Bind: When Is Retaliation Effective and Credible for Tacit Collusion? (May 2008) William J. Kolasky, Coordinated Effects in Merger Review: From Dead Frenchmen to Beautiful Minds and Mavericks, Prepared Remarks Before the ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting Washington, DC (Apr. 24, 2002). Price leadership ± Ryan Mansley, Nathan H. Miller, Gloria Sheu & Matthew C. Weinberg, A Price Leadership Model for Merger Analysis (May 2023), final version at 89 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 102975 (2023) Applications Nathan H. Miller, & Matthew C. Weinberg, Understanding the Price Effects of the MillerCoors Joint Venture, 85 Econometrica 1763 (2017) Nathan H. Miller, Gloria Sheu & Matthew C. Weinberg, Oligopolistic Price Leadership and Mergers: The United States Beer Industry, 111 Am. Econ. Rev. 3123 (2021) . ± Daniel Greenfeld, Bruce Kobayashi, Jeremy Sandford, Christopher Taylor & Nathan Wilson. Economics at the FTC: Quantitative Analyses of Two Chemical Manufacturing Mergers. 55 Rev. Indus. Org. 607 (2019) Criticisms Louis Kaplow, Horizontal Merger Analysis, 79 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 102714 (2021) U.S. Dept. of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Request for Information on Merger Enforcement 4 (Jan. 18. 2022) (specific requests re coordinated effects) Entry Peter Caradonna, Nathan Miller & Gloria Sheu, Mergers, Entry, and Consumer Welfare (Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper 3537135, 2023). See generally AppliedAntitrust.com, Coordinated Effects |
— |
Tuesday, October 15 |
LEGISLATIVE MONDAY NO CLASS |
|
Class 15 |
Thursday, October 17 Analysis of the district court opinion Recapture unilateral effects Efficiencies defense |
|
Unilateral effects 1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments 377-80 (9th ed. 2022) (unilateral effects). YouTube videos: ± The Global Antitrust Institute, Introduction to Unilateral Effects ± Howard Chang, Diversion Ratios ± Richard Schmalensee, Upward Pricing Pressure Test ± Herbert Hovenkamp, Analyzing Horizontal Mergers: Unilateral Effects in Product-Differentiated Markets (2009) Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb, Choosing Among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects, 7 Eur. Competition J. 155 (2011) (± working paper) Joseph J. Simons & Malcolm B. Coate, A Comment on Choosing Among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Effects Analysis, 8 Eur. Competition J. 429 (2012) Gregory J. Werden, Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers I: Basic Concepts and Models, in 2 Issues In Competition Law and Policy 1319 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008). Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb, Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers II: Auctions and Bargaining, in 2 Issues In Competition Law and Policy 1343 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008). ± Carl Shapiro, Unilateral Effects Calculations (rev. Oct. 2010) ± Oxera, Unilateral Effects Analysis and Market Definition: Substitutes in Merger Cases? (June 2011) ± Serge Moresi & Hans Zenger, Aggregate Diversion and Market Elasticity (June 17, 2017) ± LEAR, Merger Screen and the Use of Price Pressure Tests (Feb. 2013) ± Steven C. Salop & Serge Moresi, Updating the Merger Guidelines: Comments (Nov. 9, 2009) ± László Bokor, Strictness and Accuracy of Simple Price Tests of Merger Control (Oct. 2019) ± Charles Taragin & Margaret Loudermilk, Using Measures of Competitive Harm for Optimal Screening of Horizontal Mergers (Oct. 2, 2019) ± Nathan Miller & Gloria Sheu, Quantitative Methods for Evaluating the Unilateral Effects of Mergers (July 20, 2020), final version at 58 Rev. Indus. Org. 143 (2021) ± Jéssica Dutra & Tarun Sabarwal, Antitrust Analysis with Upward Pricing Pressure and Cost Efficiencies, 15 PloS one 1 (2020) ± Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb, Choosing among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects (working paper), final version at 7 Eur. Competition J. 155 (2011). ± Nathan H. Miller, Marc Remer, Conor Ryan & Gloria Sheu, Upward Pricing Pressure as a Predictor of Merger Price Effects (EAG Discussion Paper, No. 16-2, Mar. 2016), final version at 52 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 216 (2017). For a more detailed treatment of the use of diversion ratios in unilateral effects analysis than found in U.S. cases, see ± UK Office of Fair Trading, Anticipated Acquisition of the Online DVD Rental Subscription Business of Amazon Inc. by LOVEFiLM International Limited, No. ME/3534/08 (2008) See also ± Marc Ivaldi, Bruno Jullien, Patrick Rey, Paul Seabright & Jean Tirole, The Economics of Unilateral Effects (Interim Report for DG Competition, European Commission (Nov. 2003)) Criticisms U.S. Dept. of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Request for Information on Merger Enforcement 4 (Jan. 18. 2022) (specific requests re unilateral effects) Efficiencies defense ± Orley C. Ashenfelter, Daniel S. Hosken & Matthew C. Weinberg, Efficiencies Brewed: Pricing and Consolidation in the US Beer Industry (working paper Aug. 14, 2013), final version at 46 RAND J. Econ. 328 (2015). Opportunity costs ± Jason Fernando, Opportunity Cost Formula, Calculation, and What It Can Tell You, Investopedia.com (undated) ± Marginal Revolution University, What Is Opportunity Cost? (YouTube) ± Econclips, Opportunity Cost: The Road Not Taken (YouTube) |
Unit 10 |
U.S. Sugar/Imperial Sugar |
|
|
Class 16 |
Tuesday, October 22 Analysis of the district court opinion Product markets Geographic markets |
|
|
Unit 11 |
Sysco/U.S. Foods |
|
|
Class 17 |
Thursday, October 24 Analysis of the district court opinion Cluster markets Targeted customer markets Auction theory of unilateral effects Power buyer defense |
|
|
Unit 12 |
Case Study Problem: Ice Cream Merger |
|
|
Class 18 |
Tuesday, October 29 Review of the Class 18 homework assignment
|
|
|
Class 19 |
Tuesday, October 29 Continue analysis of Class 18 homework assignment |
|
|
Unit 13 |
Staples/Office Depot |
|
|
Class 20 |
Tuesday, November 5 Analysis of the district court opinion |
|
|
Unit 14 |
Potential Competition Mergers |
|
|
Class 21 |
Thursday, November 7 Milan/Perrigo Medtronic/Covidien Mallinckrodt (Questcor)/Novartis) Steris/Synergy Health Meta/Within
|
|
|
OPTIONAL |
Friday, November 8 3:30 pm - 5:30 pm
|
|
|
Unit 15 |
Vertical Mergers |
|
|
Class 22 |
Tuesday, November 12 General Electric/Avio Comcast/NBCUniversal AT&T/Time Warner |
|
|
Class 23 |
Thursday, November 14 AT&T/Time Warner (con't)
|
|
|
Class 24 |
Tuesday, November 19 AT&T/Time Warner (con't) Coca-Cola/Coca-Cola Enterprises |
|
|
|
Monday, November 20 |
GRADED HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT DUE BY 8:00 PM |
|
Unit 16 |
Graded Homework Assignment |
|
|
Class 25 |
Thursday, November 21 Analysis of district court opinion |
|
|
Unit 17 |
UnitedHealth/Change Healthcare |
|
|
Class 26 |
Tuesday, November 26 Analysis of district court opinion
|
|
|
Final Review Session (optional) |
|||
OPTIONAL |
Wednesday, December 4 3:30 pm - 5:30 pm |
OPTIONAL review session |
|
FINAL EXAM |
|
||
Friday, December 6 (8:30 AM) – |
5-hour Instructions for the 2023 exam NB: Some exams in the past have included two merger hypotheticals. This year, the exam will contain only one hypothetical.
|
|
|