New Materials will be posted as they are finalized
Dale Collins
Georgetown University Law Center
NB: "±" indicates that the hyperlink will take you to another site.
This page contains the memorandum introducing the course, class schedule, reading materials, and class notes for the Merger Antitrust Law course taught during the 2022 fall semester at Georgetown. It also contains links to related supplemental materials on the Applied Antitrust web site. There is no textbook for this course. Everything you need will be linked to this page.
Introduction and "Rule of the Road" Memorandum
Class schedule 2.0 (revised Nov. 16, 2023)
Cumulative class slide deck
Merger Antitrust Review: Formulas and Other Reference Materials
Required Reading
Comments and Optional Reading
Unit 1
Merger Antitrust Law: TransDigm/Takata
Class 1
Tuesday, August 29
Introduction
TransDigm/Takata
Introduction and "Rules fo the Road" Memorandum
Merger Antitrust Law: Introduction to Substance and Process (class notes)
Class 1 homework assignment (optional in the first week)
TransDigm/Takata case study (complete)
Note on Antitrust Hornbooks and Other Study Aids
Demand curves and consumer surplus (YouTube videos):
Marginal Revolution University, The Demand Curve
Marginal Revolution University, A Deeper Look at the Demand Curve
Marginal Revolution University, What Is Consumer Surplus?
Marginal Revolution University, What Is Producer Surplus?
Marginal Revolution University, What Is Deadweight Loss?
Deadweight Loss- Key Graphs of Microeconomics
Consumer welfare and alternative goals of antitrust law
± Stigler Center, Defining the Consumer Welfare Standard (Apr. 20, 2023)
± ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Is Consumer Welfare In Hot Water? (Sep't 9, 2022) (YouTube) (transcript)
Twombly/Iqbal
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
Unit 2
Predicting Merger Antitrust Enforcement Challenges
Class 2
Thursday, August 31
Predicting merger antitrust enforcement challenges
Advising clients at the first client meeting
DOJ/FTC 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines
DOJ/FTC 2023 Draft DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines
U.S. Dep't of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Horizontal Merger Guidelines (rev. Aug. 19, 2010) (under review)
U.S. Dep’t of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023)
Predicting Merger Antitrust Enforcement Challenges (class notes)
Class 2 homework assignment (optional in the first week)
Will cover in class in Class 3
Changes in antitrust enfrocement policy
Lina M. Khan, Chair. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Remarks As Prepared for Delivery Economic Club of New York, New York, NY (July 24, 2023),
± Oversight of Federal Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws, Hearing before the Subcomm. on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights of the S. Comm. on the Judiciary (Sept. 20, 2022) (video)
Jonathan Kanter. Ass't Att'y Gen., Antitrust Div., U.S. Dep't of Justice (prepared statement)
Lina Khan, Chair, Fed. Trade Comm'n (prepared statement)
Lina M. Khan, Chair. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Remarks Prepared for Delivery at the Fordham Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law & Policy, New York, NY (Sept. 16, 2022)
Jonathan Kanter, Ass't Att'y Gen. Antitrust Div., U.S. Dep't of Justice, Respecting the Antitrust Laws and Reflecting Market Realities, Prepared Remarks Before the Georgetown Antitrust Law Symposium, Washington, DC (Sept. 13, 2022)
Noah Joshua Phillips, Comm'nr, Fed. Trade Comm'n, Disparate Impact: Winners And Losers From The New M&A Policy, Prepared Remarks Before the Eighth Annual Berkeley Spring Forum on M&A and the Boardroom, San Francisco, CA (Apr. 27, 2022)
± Jeffrey T. Macher, John W. Mayo, David Sappington & MKark Whitener, Mark, The Evolution of Judicial Standards: Evidence from Litigated Merger Trials (Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper No. 3809174, June 5, 2022). ,
The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines
Evolution of the Merger Guidelines (not yet updated to include the 2023 Draft DOJ/FTC Draft Merger Gudielines)
± Carl Shapiro & Howard Shelansk, Judicial Response to the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 58 Rev. Indus. Org. 51 (2021)
± Joseph Farrell & Carl Shapiro, The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines After 10 Years, 58 Rev. Indus. Org. 1 (2021)
± Carl Shapiro, The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years, 77 Antitrust 701 (2010).
2022-23 Merger Guidelines revision project
Press Release, U.S. Dept. of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission Seek to Strengthen Enforcement Against Illegal Mergers (Jan. 18, 2022)
Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm'n, FTC and DOJ Seek Comment on Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023)
Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Justice Department and FTC Seek Comment on Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023)
U.S. Dep’t of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Draft Merger Guidelines (July 19, 2023)
U.S. Dep’t of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Fact Sheet–2023 Draft Merger Guidelines for Public Comment (July 19, 2023)
Unit 3
Some Merger Antitrust History
Unit 03 class slides (full version)
Class 3
Tuesday, September 5
A Brief History of Antitrust Law (class notes)
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Commentary
± Herbert Hovenkamp, The Slogans and Goals of Antitrust Law (June 14, 2022).
Dale Collins, Antitrust on the Brink: The Calls for Radical Reform, Presentation to the Antitrust Law Association (Sept. 16, 2021) (slides)
Christine S. Wilson, Comm'r, Fed. Trade Comm'n, The Neo-Brandeisian Revolution: Unforced Errors and the Diminution of the FTC, Prepared Remarks for the ABA Antitrust Law Section’s 2021 Fall Forum (Nov. 9, 2021)
± Carl Shapiro, Antitrust in a Time of Populism, 61 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 714 (2018).
Withdrawal of FTC 2015 Section 5 Policy Statement
Fed. Trade Comm'n, Statement of Enforcement Principles Regarding “Unfair Methods of Competition” Under Section 5 of the FTC Act (2015)
FTC video of July 1, 2021, open meeting (excerpts of Section 5 Policy Statement discussion)
NB: This is a very large file that needs to be downloaded before it can be played. Alternatively, go to the complete streaming version on the FTC web page, listen to the introduction up to the first issue and then skip to around 43:20
Congressional testimony
Oversight of Federal Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Competition Policy, Antitrust & Consumer Rights of the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 117th Cong. (Sept. 20, 2022) (statement of the Federal Trade Commission)
Dissenting Statement of Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson, Federal Trade Commission (Sept. 20, 2022)
2022 FTC Section 5 Policy Statement
Policy Statement Regarding the Scope of Unfair Methods of Competition Under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (Nov. 10, 2022) (3-1 vote)
Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm'n, FTC Restores Rigorous Enforcement of Law Banning Unfair Methods of Competition (Nov. 10, 2022)
Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Joined by Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya (Nov. 10, 2022)
Statement of Commissioner Alvaro M. Bedoya, Joined by Chair Lina M. Khan and Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter (Nov. 10, 2022)
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson (Nov. 10, 2022)
Unit 4
The DOJ/FTC Merger Review Process
Unit 04a class slides (full version--what we would have covered in class if we did not do the case study)
Class 4
Thursday, September 7
The DOJ/FTC Merger Review Process (class notes)
Class 4 homework assignment #1
Optional: Albertsons/Safeway case study (complete)
NB: There is no need for you to look at this case study in order to do the homework. It is here only if you have some interest in learning more about the transaction.
NEW--Class 4 homework assignment #2 (preparation for client meeting)
± Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, Clayton Act § 7A, 18 U.S.C. § 18a (Premerger notification and waiting period)
± HSR Form (ver. 1.0.2) (updated Aug. 4, 2017)
± HSR form instructions (Sept. 25, 2019)
Note: These forms may not display on some browsers. If you do not get the proper forms, please hit the "download" button on your browser and view the download on Adobe Acrobat Viewer (or just search for the forms using your favorite search engine).
Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 7A of the Clayton Act Links to an external site., 88 Fed. Reg. 5004 (Jan. 26, 2023) (effective Feb. 27, 2023)
Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022 (contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, Pub. L. No. 117-328, Div. GG, 136 Stat. 4459, ____ (Dec. 29, 2022)).
"Clearance"
U.S. Gov't Accountability Office, DOJ and FTC Jurisdictions Overlap, but Conflicts Are Infrequent (Jan. 2023)
Second request investigations
DOJ Model Second Request (Apr. 2022)
Note: This document does not appear on the ATD's website. It was obtained through a FOIA request.
FTC Model Second Request (Oct. 2021)
Model timing agreements
DOJ Model Timing Agreement (July 2022)
Note: This document does not appear on the ATD's website. It was obtained through a FOIA request.
FTC Model Timing Agreement (Feb. 2019)
Privilege
Order re Petition to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Dated April 24, 2009, File No. 091-0064 (F.T.C. July 21, 2009) (in the FTC’s investigation of Thoratec Corp.’s pending acquisition of HeartWare International)
Blockbuster "substantial compliance" second request litigation
Complalnt for Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Section 7A(g)(2) of the Clayton Act and Section 13(b} of the Federal Trade Commission Act, FTC v. Blockbuster. Inc., No. 1:05-cv-00463-ESH (D.D.C. filed Mar. 4, 2005)
Docket sheet (downloaded Aug. 5, 2023)
Motion for Order Pursuant to Section 7A(g)(2) of the Clayton Act and Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act--Mar. 4, 2005
Supporting memorandum filed under seal
FTC's reply filed under seal
Notice of Settlement (Mar. 9, 2005)
Agreed Order Regarding Extension of Hart-Scott-Rodino Waiting Period (Mar. 9, 2005)
Dismissed with prejudice (Mar 9, 2005)
Withdrawal of FTC 1995 Policy Statement on Prior Approvals
Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm’n, FTC Acts To Reduce Prior-Approval Burden on Companies in Merger Cases (June 22, 1995)
Fed. Trade Comm'n, Notice and Request for Comment Regarding Statement of Policy Concerning Prior Approval and Prior Notice Provisions in Merger Cases, 60 Fed. Reg. 39745 (Aug. 3, 1995).
Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm’n, FTC Rescinds 1995 Policy Statement that Limited the Agency’s Ability to Deter Problematic Mergers (July 21, 2021).
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Noah Joshua Phillips (July 21, 2021)
Other supplemental materials
± FTC Competition Enforcement Database: Merger Enforcement Actions (since 1996)
± FTC Enforcement: Cases and Proceedings
± DOJ Merger Enforcement web page
± DOJ and FTC, Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report: Fiscal Year 2021 (Feb. 2023) (latest published report)
Makan Delrahim, It Takes Two: Modernizing the Merger Review Process, Prepared Remarks Before the 2018 Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium, Washington, DC (Sept. 25, 2018)
Unit 5
Merger Antitrust Settlements
Unit 05 class slides (full version--what we would have covered in class if we did not do the case study)
Unit 05 class slides--Kroger/Albertsons
For additional supplemental materials, see 13. DOJ/FTC Merger Review and Settlement Procedures in AppliedAntitrust.com
Class 5
Tuesday, September 12
Settlements
Kroger/Albertsons
Press Release, The Kroger Co., Kroger and Albertsons Companies Announce Comprehensive Divestiture Plan with C&S Wholesale Grocers, LLC in Connection with Proposed Merger (September 8, 2023)
Unit 5. Merger Antitrust Settlements (class notes)
There is no homework assignment for this class
Case studies
Albertsons/Safeway case study (complete)
TransDigm/Takata case study (complete)
DaVita/University of Utah case study (complete)
Kroger/Albertsons (in investigation)
Agency materials: DOJ
Makan Delrahim,Ass't Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div., Improving the Antitrust Consensus, Prepared Remarks Before the New York State Bar Association Antitrust Section, New York, NY (Jan. 25, 2018)
U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div., Antitrust Division Manual Ch. 4 D: Negotiating and Entering Consent Decrees (5th ed. updated Mar. 2014)
U.S. Dep't of Justice, Antitrust Div., Antitrust Division Policy Guide to Merger Remedies (rev. June 2011) (news release)
Agency materials: FTC
Fed. Trade Comm’n, Bureau of Competition, Negotiating Merger Remedies (Jan. 2012)
Fed. Trade Comm'n, The FTC’s Merger Remedies 2006-2012: A Report of the Bureaus of Competition and Economics (Jan. 2017) (FTC news release)
Dan Ducore & Naomi Licker, Bureau of Competition, Fed. Trade Comm'n, Looking Back (Again) at FTC Merger Remedies (Feb. 3, 2017)
Fed. Trade Comm'n, Bureau of Competition, Frequently Asked Questions About Merger Consent Order Provisions (downloaded August 8, 2019)
Deborah L. Feinstein, Dir., Bureau of Competition, Fed. Trade Comm'n, The Significance of Consent Orders in the Federal Trade Commission’s Competition Enforcement Efforts (Sept. 17, 2013)
Other materials
Jonathan M. Jacobson, Issues in Antitrust Consent Decrees, Presented to the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (Apr. 26, 2018)
William J. Donovan & Breck P. McAllister, Consent Decrees in the Enforcement of Federal Anti-Trust Laws, 46 Harv. L. Rev. 885 (1933) (for some early history of the use of consent decrees in antitrust cases)
Unit 6
Merger Antitrust Litigation
For additional supplemental materials, see 14. Merger Antitrust Litigation in AppliedAntitrust.com
Class 6
Thursday, September 14
Litigating merger antitrust cases
ABI/Grupo Modelo
Unit 6. Merger Antitrust Litigation (class notes)
There is no homework assignment for this class
Case study
The Course of Litigation: EnergySolutions’ Acquisition of Waste Control Specialists (Nov. 16, 2016)
ABI/Grupo Modelo
± Planet Money, Episode 438: Mavericks, Monopolies and Beer(Feb. 23, 2013) (ABI/Grupo Modelo)
± WSJ Explains, The Antitrust Lawsuit That Helped Make Modelo America’s Top Beer, WSJ.coml (Sept. 20, 2023) (video)
± Morning Brew, How Mexican Beer Conquered The American Beer Market (YouTube undated)
Unit 7
Hertz/Avis Budget/Dollar Thrifty
For additional supplemental materials, see 13. DOJ/FTC Merger Review and Settlement Procedures in AppliedAntitrust.com
Class 7
Tuesday, September 19
The 2010 Hertz/Dollar Thrifty deal
There are no class notes for this class
Class 7 homework assignment
I encourage you to work in groups on this assignment
YouTube videos
Present value of a perpetuity (perpetual annuity)
Class 8
Thursday, September 21
Antitrust risk-shifting in the merger agreement
The bidding war with Avis
FTC review and settlement
Aftermath
Allocating Antitrust Risk in Merger Agreements (class notes)
Risk-shifting in Hertz/Dollar Thrifty
Risk-shifting in Hertz/Dollar Thrifty (optional class notes)
Risk-shifting generally
For a collection of antitrust-related provisions appearing in merger agreements, see Dale Collins, Sample Antitrust-Related Provisions in M&A Agreements, AntitrustUnpacked.com (July 2, 2018)
± Scott Sher, Brendan Coffman & Alexandra Keck, Risk Allocation in Merger Agreements in an Era of Increased Enforcement (Oct. 23, 2020)
± Gail F. Levine, Martha E. McGarry, Andrew J. Noreuil, Camila Panama & William H. Stallings, Mayer Brown, M&A Lawyers Adapt to New Era of Antitrust Enforcement: How Contractual Provisions Are Evolving (Jan. 2023).
± Richard Hall & Maurio A. Fiore, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, U.S. Regulatory Merger Control Regimes Negotiating with Deal Delays in Mind (2023).
± Stephen Fraidin, Joel Mitnick, & Ross Steinberg, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, Hell or High Water Provisions in Merger Agreements: A Practical Approach (May 25, 2022)
± Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, “Hell Or High Water” Clauses in Merger & Acquisition Agreements (Aug. 19, 2022)
+ Dale Collins, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Antitrust Reverse Termination Fees—2020 Q3 Update (Dec. 28, 2020) (data set).
Anthem/Cigna contract litigation
In re Anthem-Cigna Merger Litig., No. CV 2017-0114-JTL, 2020 WL 5106556 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020) (unpublished), judgment entered, (Del. Ch. 2020), summarily aff'd sub nom. Cigna Corp. v. Anthem, Inc., 251 A.3d 1015 (Del. 2021) (unpublished)
The Hertz/Avis Budget/Dollar Thifty bidding war
Hertz/Avis Budget/Dollar Thrifty: The Bidding War for a collection on SEC materials and press releases on the bidding war for Dollar Thrifty between Hertz and Avis Budget.
Unit 8
Competition Economics
Class 9
Tuesday, September 26
Part 1. Demand, Costs, and
Profit-Maximization
Competition Economics Part 1 (class notes)
There are no reading materials for this class
Class 9 second homework assignment: The C&S divestiture
Studies
± The Merger Working Group, International Competition Network, The Role of Economics and Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis (Apr. 2013).
YouTube videos
Revenue, Costs and Profit Part 1
Revenue, Costs and Profit Part 2
Revenue, Costs and Profit Part 3
Marginal Revolution University, The Demand Curve
Marginal Revolution University, A Deeper Look at the Demand Curve
Marginal Revolution University, The Demand Curve Shifts
Marginal Revenue for a Monopolist Facing Linear Demand
Finding a Revenue Function from a Linear Demand Function
Marginal Revolution University, The Supply Curve
Marginal Revolution University, A Deeper Look at the Supply Curve
Marginal Revolution University, The Supply Curve Shifts
Marginal Revolution University, The Equilibrium Price and Quantity
Marginal Revolution University, Exploring Equilibrium
Marginal Revolution University. Maximizing Profit Under Competition
Commentary
Dennis W. Carlton & Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization (4th ed. 2005).
A Marginal Revenue Problem Step-by-Step (by Step)
A Profit-Maximization Problem Step-by-Step (by Step)
± See also Dave Berry, Up in the Air on the Question of Gravity, Baltimore Sun, Mar. 16, 1997, at 3J
Really, really optional: If you want to understand derivatives and would like a quick introduction, see the following YouTube videos:
Derivatives... What? (on the theory of derivatives)
Derivatives... How? (on calculating the derivative--first 6.5 minutes is sufficient)
Class 10
Thursday, September 28
Part 2. Markets and Market Equilibrium
Substitutes, complements, and elasticities
Perfectly competitive markets
Perfectly monopolized markets
Imperfectly competitive markets
Basic Competition Economics Part 2 (class notes)
There are no reading materials for this class
Commentary
± Kenneth G. Elzinga & David E. Mills, The Lerner Index of Monopoly Power: Origins and Uses (working paper Jan. 18, 2011), final version at 101 Am. Econ. Rev. 558 (2011).
YouTube videos
How Substitutes and Complements Affect Demand
Marginal Revolution University, Elasticity of Demand
Marginal Revolution University, Calculating Elasticity of Demand
Marginal Revolution University, Elasticity and its Applications
Marginal Revolution University, Calculating the Elasticity of Demand
Intuition for Monopoly and Elasticity
Marginal Revolution University, The Equilibrium Price and Quantity
Marginal Revolution University, Exploring Equilibrium
Marginal Revolution University, Introduction to the Competitive Firm
Marginal Revolution University, Maximizing Profit Under Competition
How to Solve Cournot Problem: Algebra-Based Solution
Liam Malloy, Cournot Asymmetric Costs and n Firms
Bertrand Oligopoly (solving a Bertrand oligopoly problem)
OPTIONAL
REVIEW
Friday, September 29
3:30 pm - 5:30 pm
MacD 300
Optional economics review session
Unit 9
H&R Block/TaxACT
Unit 9a class slides (Classes 11-13--market definition)
Unit 9b class slides (Classes 14-15--anticompetitive effects)
Class 11
Tuesday, October 3
Analysis of the district court opinion
Institutional setting
Market definition: (Brown Shoe factors)
Introduction to the hypothetical monopolist test
Market Definition (class notes)
Supplemental (but you may find useful): Introduction to Formal Horizontal Merger Analysis. We will cover all the material in this deck over the next several several weeks.
Case commentary
Marc Remer & Frederick R. Warren-Boulton, United States v. H&R Block: Market Definition in Court since the 2010 Merger Guidelines, 59 Antitrust Bull. 599 (2014).
Generally
AppliedAntitrust.com, Market Definition
1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments ch. 6 (9th ed. 2022) (market definition). This is the best complication of the current law on market definition. It is the first source to which you should turn if you have questions about how the courts apply the law.
± Christine Wilson & Keith Klovers, Same Rule, Different Result: How the Narrowing of Product Markets Has Altered Substantive Antitrust Rules, 84 Antitrust L.J. 55 (2021)
± Serge Moresi, Steven C. Salop & John Woodbury, Market Definition in Merger Analysis (Feb. 9, 2017)
± Malcolm Coate & Jeffrey Fischer, Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis (Jan. 2010)
± Jonathan B. Baker, Market Definition: An Analytical Overview, 74 Antitrust L.J. 129 (2007).
± Jonathan B. Baker & Timothy F. Bresnahan, Economic Evidence in Antitrust: Defining Markets and Measuring Market Power in Handbook of Antitrust Economics 1 (Paolo Buccirossi ed., 2008).
± Gregory J. Werden, The History of Antitrust Market Delineation, 76 Marquette L. Rev. 123 (1992).
Criticism
± Louis Kaplow, Why (Ever) Define Markets?, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 437 (2010)
± Louis Kaplow, Market Definition Alchemy May 2013), published at 57 Antitrust Bull. 915 (2012)
± Malcolm B. Coate, Market Definition is Not Alchemy (Jan. 22, 2014).
Louis Kaplow, Market Definition: Impossible and Counterproductive, 79 Antitrust L.J. 361 (2013)
YouTube
The Global Antitrust Institute, Market Definition (general introduction)
H&R Block/TaxACT commentary
Marc Remer & Frederick R. Warren-Boulton, United States v. H&R Block: Market Definition in Court since the 2010 Merger Guidelines, 59 Antitrust Bull. 599 (2014).
± Malcolm B. Coate, Market Definition in Differentiated Goods When the Final Consumer Buys the Good: Insights from the H&R Block Case (Feb. 12, 2014).
± Joseph J. Simons & Malcolm B. Coate, Should DOJ’s Controversial Approach to Market Definition Control Merger Litigation, the Case of US v. H&R Block (Oct. 24, 2013).
± James A. Keyte, United States v. H&R Block: The DOJ Invokes Brown Shoe to Shed the Oracle Albatross, Antitrust, Spring 2012, at 32.
± Deborah Feinstein, The Significance of H&R Block: Brown Shoe Meets Merger Simulation, Antitrust, Spring 2012, at 5.
Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm
Matthew T. Panhans, The Rise, Fall, and Legacy of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm (Jan. 2023).
William E. Kovacic & Carl Shapiro, Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking, 14 J. Econ. Perspectives 43 (2000).
—
Tuesday, October 10
LEGISLATIVE MONDAY
NO CLASS
Class 12
Thursday, October 5
Analysis of the district court opinion
Market definition (critical loss tests)
Market Definition (Class notes)
Critical loss analysis
± Joseph Farrell & Carl Shapiro, Improving Critical Loss Analysis, Antitrust Source, Feb. 2008.
± Michael Katz & Carl Shapiro, Further Thoughts on Critical Loss, Antitrust Source, Mar. 2004
± Michael Katz & Carl Shapiro, Critical Loss: Let’s Tell the Whole Story, Antitrust, Spring 2003
Daniel P. O’Brien & Abraham L. Wickelgren, A Critical Analysis of Critical Loss Analysis, 71 Antitrust L.J. 161 (2003)
± David T. Scheffman & Joseph J. Simons, The State of Critical Loss Analysis: Let’s Make Sure We Understand the Whole Story, Antitrust Source, Nov. 2003
± Daniel O’Brien & Abraham Wickelgren, The State of Critical Loss Analysis: Reply to Scheffman and Simons, Antitrust Source, Mar. 2004.
± Carl Shapiro, Mergers with Differentiated Products, Antitrust, Spring 1996, at 23.
± Oxera, "Could: or :Would"? The Difference between Two Hypothetical Monopolists (Nov. 2008)
± Serge Moresi & Hans Zenger, Recapture Ratios In Merger Analysis (Oct. 29, 2017).
Øystein Daljord & Lars Sørgard, Single-Product Versus Uniform SSNIPs, 31 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 142 (2011) (± working paper version)
See generally AppliedAntitrust.com, Market Definition
Expert economic witnesses
± Brian Rafkin & Blair Kuykendall, Antitrust Cancel Culture: Do Economic Experts Really Cancel Each Other Out in Merger Litigation?, Anitrust, Spring 2021, at 55.
Office of the Inspector General, Fed. Trade Comm'n, OIG Report No. A-20-03, Audit of Federal Trade Commission Expert Witness Services (Nov. 14, 2019)
—
Tuesday, October 10
LEGISLATIVE MONDAY
NO CLASS
Class 13
Thursday, October 12
Analysis of the district court opinion
Market definition (diversion ratio tests)
Market Definition (class notes)
Commentary
± Serge Moresi & Hans Zenger, Recapture Ratios In Merger Analysis (Oct. 29, 2017).
± Oliver Budzinski & Isabel Ruhmer, Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey (working paper Jan. 2009), final version at 6 J. Competition L. & Econ. 277 (2010).
± Oxera, Diversion Ratios: Why DoesIit Matter Where Customers Go If a Shop Is Closed? (Feb. 2009)
± Howard Chang, Diversion Ratios (2012) (YouTube)
Class 14
Tuesday, October 17
Analysis of the district court opinion
PNB presumption
Ease of entry defense
Coordinated effects
Elimination of a "maverick"
Unit 9 reading materials (more materials to be added later)
Anticompetitive Effects in Horizontal Mergers (class notes)
Downward-Pricing Pressure Defenses (class notes--entry only)
Identifying market participants; determining market share and concentration
1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments 361-71 (9th ed. 2022)
Concentration thresholds
+ Volker Nocke & Michael D. Whinston, Concentration Thresholds for Horizontal Mergers, 112 Am. Econ. Rev. 1915 (2022).
Coordinated effects
1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments 375-77 (9th ed. 2022) (coordinated effects).
Janusz A. Ordover, Coordinated Effects, in 2 Issues In Competition Law and Policy 1359 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008).
Miguel de la Mano, Coordinated Effects (undated)
+ John Asker & Volker Nocke, Collusion, Mergers, And Related Antitrust Issues (NBER Working Paper 29175, Aug. 2021), final version, 5 Handbook of Industrial Organization 177 (Kate Ho, Ali Hortacsu & Alessandro Lizzeri eds., 2021)
± Simon Loertscher & Leslie M. Marx, Coordinated Effects in Merger Review, 64 J.L. & Econ. 705 (2021) (± Appendix)
Robert H. Porter, Mergers and Coordinated Effects, 73 Int'l J. Indus. Org. ___ (2020) (± slide deck)
± Natalia II Fabra & Massimo Motta, Assessing Coordinated Effcts in Merger Cases (Nov. 30, 2016), final version at Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization ch. 5 (Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini eds. 2018)
± Jonathan B. Baker, Mavericks, Mergers and Exclusion: Proving Coordinated Competitive Effects Under the Antitrust Laws, 77 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 135 (2002).
± William E. Kovacic Robert C. Marshall, Leslie M. Marx & Steven P. Schulenberg, Quantitative Analysis of Coordinated Effects, 76 Antitrust L.J. 397 (2009).
± Oxera, The Ties that Bind: When Is Retaliation Effective and Credible for Tacit Collusion? (May 2008)
William J. Kolasky, Coordinated Effects in Merger Review: From Dead Frenchmen to Beautiful Minds and Mavericks, Prepared Remarks Before the ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting Washington, DC (Apr. 24, 2002).
Applications
Nathan H. Miller, & Matthew C. Weinberg, Understanding the Price Effects of the MillerCoors Joint Venture, 85 Econometrica 1763 (2017)
Nathan H. Miller, Gloria Sheu & Matthew C. Weinberg, Oligopolistic Price Leadership and Mergers: The United States Beer Industry, 111 Am. Econ. Rev. 3123 (2021) .
± Daniel Greenfeld, Bruce Kobayashi, Jeremy Sandford, Christopher Taylor & Nathan Wilson. Economics at the FTC: Quantitative Analyses of Two Chemical Manufacturing Mergers. 55 Rev. Indus. Org. 607 (2019)
Criticisms
Louis Kaplow, Horizontal Merger Analysis, 79 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 102714 (2021)
U.S. Dept. of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Request for Information on Merger Enforcement 4 (Jan. 18. 2022) (specific requests re coordinated effects)
Entry
Peter Caradonna, Nathan Miller & Gloria Sheu, Mergers, Entry, and Consumer Welfare (Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper 3537135, 2023).
See generally AppliedAntitrust.com, Coordinated Effects
Class 15
Thursday, October 19
Analysis of the district court opinion
Recapture unilateral effects
Efficiencies defense
Unit 9 reading materials (with some added material)
Anticompetitive Effects in Horizontal Mergers (class notes)
NB: Revised November 7, 2023--Corrected slide 120 on the elements of the unilateral effects theory
Downward-Pricing Pressure Defenses (expanded class notes--entry and efficiencies)
Unilateral effects
1 ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments 377-80 (9th ed. 2022) (unilateral effects).
YouTube videos:
± The Global Antitrust Institute, Introduction to Unilateral Effects
± Howard Chang, Diversion Ratios
± Richard Schmalensee, Upward Pricing Pressure Test
± Herbert Hovenkamp, Analyzing Horizontal Mergers: Unilateral Effects in Product-Differentiated Markets (2009)
Gregory J. Werden, Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers I: Basic Concepts and Models, in 2 Issues In Competition Law and Policy 1319 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008).
Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb, Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers II: Auctions and Bargaining, in 2 Issues In Competition Law and Policy 1343 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008).
± Carl Shapiro, Unilateral Effects Calculations (rev. Oct. 2010)
± Oxera, Unilateral Effects Analysis and Market Definition: Substitutes in Merger Cases? (June 2011)
± Serge Moresi & Hans Zenger, Aggregate Diversion and Market Elasticity (June 17, 2017)
± LEAR, Merger Screen and the Use of Price Pressure Tests (Feb. 2013)
± Steven C. Salop & Serge Moresi, Updating the Merger Guidelines: Comments (Nov. 9, 2009)
± László Bokor, Strictness and Accuracy of Simple Price Tests of Merger Control (Oct. 2019)
± Charles Taragin & Margaret Loudermilk, Using Measures of Competitive Harm for Optimal Screening of Horizontal Mergers (Oct. 2, 2019)
± Nathan Miller & Gloria Sheu, Quantitative Methods for Evaluating the Unilateral Effects of Mergers (July 20, 2020), final version at 58 Rev. Indus. Org. 143 (2021)
± Jéssica Dutra & Tarun Sabarwal, Antitrust Analysis with Upward Pricing Pressure and Cost Efficiencies, 15 PloS one 1 (2020)
± Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb, Choosing among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects (working paper), final version at 7 Eur. Competition J. 155 (2011).
± Nathan H. Miller, Marc Remer, Conor Ryan & Gloria Sheu, Upward Pricing Pressure as a Predictor of Merger Price Effects (EAG Discussion Paper, No. 16-2, Mar. 2016), final version at 52 Int'l J. Indus. Org. 216 (2017).
For a more detailed treatment of the use of diversion ratios in unilateral effects analysis than found in U.S. cases, see ± UK Office of Fair Trading, Anticipated Acquisition of the Online DVD Rental Subscription Business of Amazon Inc. by LOVEFiLM International Limited, No. ME/3534/08 (2008)
See also ± Marc Ivaldi, Bruno Jullien, Patrick Rey, Paul Seabright & Jean Tirole, The Economics of Unilateral Effects (Interim Report for DG Competition, European Commission (Nov. 2003))
Criticisms
U.S. Dept. of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Request for Information on Merger Enforcement 4 (Jan. 18. 2022) (specific requests re unilateral effects)
Efficiencies defense
± Orley C. Ashenfelter, Daniel S. Hosken & Matthew C. Weinberg, Efficiencies Brewed: Pricing and Consolidation in the US Beer Industry (working paper Aug. 14, 2013), final version at 46 RAND J. Econ. 328 (2015).
Opportunity costs
± Jason Fernando, Opportunity Cost Formula, Calculation, and What It Can Tell You, Investopedia.com (undated)
± Marginal Revolution University, What Is Opportunity Cost? (YouTube)
± Econclips, Opportunity Cost: The Road Not Taken (YouTube)
Unit 10
U.S. Sugar/Imperial Sugar
Unit 10 class slides (complete)
Class 16
Tuesday, October 24
Analysis of the district court opinion
Product markets
Geographic markets
Class slides (background only--will not be covered in class)
Market Definition (class notes--especially on supply-side switching (slides 28-38) and geographic markets (slides 76-94))
Review Anticompetitive Effects and Downward-Pricing Pressure Defenses class notes if needed
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Advance copy of Class 18 homework assignment (ungraded practice exam problem to be posted after class)
Aadvance copy of the Class 20 homework assignment.
NB: There will be no instructor's answer for this assignment.
Selected case materials
± Trial Exhibit [Testimony of Dr. Dov Rothman] (April 20, 2022)
± Trial Exhibit [DOJ Closing Statement] (April 21, 2022)
± Plaintiff United States of America’s Post-Trial Brief (May 6, 2022)
± Defendants' Post-Trial Brief (filed May 20, 2022; redacted version filed May 26, 2022)
For other case materials (including trial transcripts), see here
Commentary
Unit 11
Sysco/U.S. Foods
Class 17
Thursday, October 26
Analysis of the district court opinion
Cluster markets
Targeted customer markets
Auction theory of unilateral effects
Power buyer defense
Sysco/US Foods (class notes)
Downward-Pricing Pressure Defenses (class notes--complete)
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Work on the Class 18 homework assignment (ungraded practice exam problem)
Commentary
± Gregory J. Werden, The Hypothetical Monopolist Test in Sysco: A Litigation Muddle Needing Analytic Clarity, 12 J. Competition L. & Econ. 341 (2016)
Unit 12
Case Study Problem: Ice Cream Merger
Unit 12 class slides (rev. Nov. 7, 2023)
NB: Corrected slide 52 on the elements of the unilateral effects theory
Class 18
Tuesday, October 31
Review of the Class 18 homework assignment
Class 18 homework assignment (ungraded--practice exam problem)
NB: There are no reading guidance, reading materials, or class notes for this unit. Spend all of your time on the homework assignment. This is also a good time to work on your "boilerplate" of merger antitrust concepts and tests that you can copy into the exam answers.
Class 19
Thursday, November 2
Continue analysis of Class 18 homework assignment
Class 19 reading guidance ("Loose ends")
Downward-Pricing Pressure Defenses (class notes-complete)
Class 20 homework assignment
NB: This
assignment is due before class on Tuesday, November 7. There will be no instructor's answer for this assignment.
You also might look at the the following materials, which will be posted after class to give you some more examples of horizontal merger exam hypotheticals. We will not discuss these in class.
Shampoo Merger and class slides (2022)
(no instructor's answer other than the class slides)
Fountain Pen Merger and instructor's answer (2021) (class slides)
Unit 13
Staples/Office Depot
Class 20
Tuesday, November 7
Analysis of the district court opinion
There are no separate class notes for this unit. Review Market Definition, Anticompetitive Effects, and Downward-Pricing Pressure Defenses class notes as needed
Class 20 homework assignment
NB: There will be no instructor's answer for this assignment.
Commentary on the 2015 Staples/Office Depot attempted merger
+ Chris Sagers, Ill-Fated Strategy in Staples-Office Depot Deal, N.Y. Times, May 18, 2016.
Commentary on the 1996 Staples/Office Depot attempted merger
± Orley Ashenfelter, David Ashmore, Jonathon B. Baker, Suzanne Gleason & Daniel S. Hosken, Econometric Methods in Staples (working paper Apr. 9, 2004), revised final version at Empirical Methods in Merger Analysis: Econometric Analysis of Pricing in FTC v. Staples, 13 Int'l J. Econ. Bus. 265 (2006).
± Serdar Dalkir & Frederick R. Warren-Boulton, Prices, Market Definition, and the Effects of Merger: Staples-Office Depot (1997), in The Antitrust Revolution: Economics, Competition, and Policy (John E. Kwoka, J. & Lawrence J. White eds., 7th ed. 2018).
± Jerry A. Hausman & Gregory K. Leonard, Documents Versus Econometrics in Staples (working paper Sept. 5, 1997).
± Mark D. Manuszak & Charles C. Moul, Prices and Endogenous Market Structure in Office Supply Superstores, 56 J. Indus. Org. 94 (2008).
± Jonathan B. Baker, Econometric Analysis in FTC v. Staples, 18 J. Pub. Pol'y & Marketing 11 (1999).
± Jonathan B. Baker & Robert Pitofsky, A Turning Point in Merger Enforcement: Federal Trade Commission v. Staples (working paper Oct. 2006), final version in Antitrust Stories 311 (Eleanor M. Fox & Daniel A. Crane eds., 2007).
Unit 14
Potential Competition Mergers
Class 21
Thursday, November 9
Milan/Perrigo
Medtronic/Covidien
Mallinckrodt (Questcor)/Novartis)
Steris/Synergy Health
Meta/Within
Potential competition mergers (class notes)
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Additional case materials
Commentary
ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments (Ninth) ch. 3(c)(1) (2022) (mergers between potential competitors)
± Herbert Hovenkamp, Potential Competition (U. of Penn. Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 23-36, Aug. 16, 2023).
± C. Scott Hemphill & Tim Wu, Nascent Competitors, 168 U. Penn. L. Rev. 1879 (2020)
± John M. Yun, Are We Dropping the Crystal Ball? Understanding Nascent & Potential Competition in Antitrust, 104 Marq. L. Rev. 613 (2021).
± John M. Yun, Bruce H. Kobayashi, Abbott B. Lipsky, Alexander Raskovich, and , Joshua D. Wright, Potential and Nascent Competition in Merger Review: Global Antitrust Institute Comment on the DOJ-FTC Request for Information on Merger Enforcement (George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 22-16, April 21, 2022).
± A. Douglas Melamed, Mergers Involving Nascent Competition (2022)
± Disruptive Competition Project, U.S. Merger Enfrocement Experiments Could Significantly Harm Innovation and the Start-Up Ecosystem, Project DisCo.com (Nov. 15, 2022)
"Killer acquisitions"
± Colleen Cunningham, Florian Ederer & Song Ma, Killer Acquisitions, 129 J. Pol. Econ. 649 (2021)
± Jonathan Barnett, “Killer Acquisitions” Reexamined: Economic Hyperbole in the Age of Populist Antitrust. (March 28, 2023).
± Kristen C. Limarzi & Harry R.S. Phillips, "Killer Acquisitions,"Big Tech, and Section 2: A Solution In Search of a Problem, Competition Pol'y Int'l (May 2020).
OPTIONAL
REVIEW
Friday, November 10
3:30 pm - 5:30 pm
MCD 208
Optional horizontal mergers review session
GRADED HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT (posted in the evening). Your answer must be emailed to me by 5:00 pm on Monday, November 20.
Merger Antitrust Review: Formulas and Other Reference Materials
You also might look at the the following materials, which will be posted after class to give you some more examples of horizontal merger exam hypotheticals. We will not discuss these in class.
Shampoo Merger and class slides (2022)
(no instructor's answer other than the class slides)
Fountain Pen Merger and instructor's answer (2021) (class slides)
Beer Bottle Merger and instructor's answer (2020)
Unit 15
Vertical Mergers
Class 22
Tuesday, November 14
General Electric/Avio
Comcast/NBCUniversal
AT&T/Time Warner
Vertical mergers (class notes)
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Work on the graded homework assignment
Additional case materials
2020 DOJ/FTC Vertical Merger Guidelines
U.S. Dep't of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, Vertical Merger Guidelines (June 30, 2020)
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rohit Chopra (June 30, 2020)
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter (June 30, 2020)
Fed. Trade Comm'n, Commentary on Vertical Merger Enforcement (Dec. 2020)
2021 FTC withdrawal
News Release, Fed. Trade Comm'n, Federal Trade Commission Withdraws Vertical Merger Guidelines and Commentary (Sept. 15, 2021)
Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan, Commissioner Rohit Chopra, and Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter on the Withdrawal of the Vertical Merger Guidelines (Sept. 15, 2021)
Prepared Remarks of Commissioner Rohit Chopra (Sept. 15, 2021)
Dissenting Statement of Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson (Sept. 15, 2021)
Oral Remarks of Commissioner Christine S. Wilson (Sept. 15, 2021)
2021 DOJ response
News Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Justice Department Issues Statement on the Vertical Merger Guidelines (Sept. 15, 2021)
NB: The statement does not withdraw the DOJ from the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines
Double marginalization
Marginal Revolution University, Double Marginalization Problem
Luke Bessey, Managerial Economics - Double Marginalization
± John Kwoka & Margaret Slade, Second Thoughts on Double Marginalization (Jan. 2020)
± Ugur Akgün, Cristina Caffarra, Federico Etro & Robert Stillman, On the Welfare Impact of Mergers of Complements: Raising Rivals’ Costs Versus Elimination of Double Marginalization, Economics Letters, 195, 109429 (2020)
± Philippe Choné, Laurent Linnemer & Thibaud Vergé, Double Marginalization, Market foreclosure, and Vertical Iintegration (Feb. 16, 2023)
± Laurent Linnemer, Doubling Back on Double Marginalization (Sept. 8, 2021), final version at 61 Rev. Indus. Org. 1 (2022)
± Fernando Luco & Guillermo Marshall, Vertical Integration with Multiproduct Firms: When Eliminating Double Marginalization May Hurt Consumers (Dec. 7, 2018) (slides)
Commentary
ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments (Ninth) ch. 3(c)(2) (2022) (vertical mergers)
± Carl Shapiro & Herbert Hovenkamp, How Will the FTC Evaluate Vertical Mergers?, ProMarket.org (Sept. 23, 2021)
± Steven C. Salop, A Suggested Revision of the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines (May 2, 2021)
Steven C. Salop, Invigorating Vertical Merger Enforcement, 127 Yale L.J. 1962 (2018)
Jon Sallet, Dep. Ass't Att'y Gen., Antitrust Div., U.S. Dep't of Justice, The Interesting Case of the Vertical Merger (Nov. 17, 2016)
Class 23
Tuesday, November 16
AT&T/Time Warner (con't)
There is no reading guidance for this class. Finish reading the AT&T/Time Warner opinion.
Vertical mergers (class notes)
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Work on the graded homework assignment
Case commentary
± Carl Shapiro, Vertical Mergers and Input Foreclosure Lessons from the AT&T/Time Warner Case, 59 Rev. Indus. Org. 303 (2021)
± Dennis W. Carlton, Georgi V. Giozov, Mark A. Israel & Allan, Shampine, A Retrospective Analysis of the AT&T/Time Warner Merger (August 25, 2021), forthcoming in Journal of Law and Economics
± Gregory S. Crawford, Robin S. Lee, Michael D. Whinston & Ali Yurukoglu, AT&T/Time Warner and Antitrust Policy toward Vertical Mergers, CPI Antitrust Chronicle (July 2019).
Monday, November 20
GRADED HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT DUE BY 5:00 PM
Class 24
Tuesday, November 21
AT&T/Time Warner (con't)
Coca-Cola/Coca-Cola Enterprises
There is no reading guidance for this class. Finish reading the AT&T/Time Warner opinion and read the Coca-Cola materials
Vertical mergers (class notes)
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
Unit 16
Graded Homework Assignment
Class 25
Tuesday, November 28
Analysis of district court opinion
Review of Graded Homework Assignment
Unit 17
UnitedHealth/Change Healthcare
Class 26
Tuesday, November 30
Analysis of district court opinion
There are no class notes for this unit
THERE IS NO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS CLASS
European Commission Press Release IP/23/5990, Commission sends Amazon Statement of Objections over proposed acquisition of iRobot (Nov. 27, 2023).
Final Review Session (optional)
OPTIONAL
REVIEW
Friday, December 1
3:30 PM - 5:30 PM
McD208
OPTIONAL review session
Merger Antitrust Review: Formulas and Other Reference Materials) (rev. Nov. 29, 2023)
Shampoo Merger and class slides (2022)
(no instructor's answer other than the class slides)
Fountain Pen Merger and instructor's answer (2021) (class slides)
Beer Bottle Merger and instructor's answer (2020)
Final exam 2022 (Labelstock Merger/Providence Hospital/Mid Montana Clinic Merger)
Final exam 2021 (Hydrogen Peroxide Merger/Chicken Feed Merger)
Final exam 2020 (Vector-Based Illustration Software Merger/Visa/Plaid Merger)
FINAL EXAM
Tuesday, December 5 (8:30 AM) –
Thursday, December 14 (6:30 PM)
[Times to be confirmed]
5-hour
Open book
Take home
Instructions for the 2022 exam
(Approved by the Registrar's Office)
Instructions for the 2023 exam
(Submitted to the Registrar's Office--Pending approval)
NB: Exams in the past have included two merger hypothetical. This year the exam will contain only one hypothetical.